1
Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Shree Bankey Bihari Dental College and Research Centre, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
2
Professor and Head, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences (KIDS), KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
3
MDS (Oral Medicine and Radiology), Consultant Oral Radiologist, Dr. Dongre’s Megascan Imaging Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
4
Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Dayananda Sagar College of Dental Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
5
Post Graduate Student, Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Dental College, Ariyur, Puducherry, India
6
MDS Oral Pathology, Axay Dental, Tech Zone 4, Noida Extension, Uttar Pradesh, India
| Aim This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical outcomes of static computer-assisted guided implant surgery. The focus was on measuring deviations between planned and actual implant positions. Implant survival and patient satisfaction were also assessed. Methodology Forty patients received 80 implants using stereolithographic static guides supported by teeth, mucosa, or bone. Digital planning with CBCT and intraoral scans was performed. Postoperative CBCT evaluated deviations, and patients were followed for 18 months. Results Mean deviations were 1.05 mm coronally, 1.32 mm apically, 3.38° angularly, and 0.49 mm in depth. Tooth-supported guides were most accurate, while posterior and maxillary sites showed slightly higher deviations. Survival rate was 98.7% with minimal complications. Conclusion Static guided implant surgery demonstrated high accuracy, predictable placement, and favorable clinical outcomes. The technique reduced surgical risks and enhanced prosthetically driven positioning. Patient satisfaction was consistently high.
Static guided surgery; Digital implantology; Accuracy; CBCT; Implant survival.