Journal of Rare Cardiovascular Diseases

ISSN: 2299-3711 (Print) e-ISSN: 2300-5505 (Online)

Assessing the role of doppler ultrasound and D-dimer level in predicting asymptomatic DVT during pregnancy

1Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Al-Qadisiya, Iraq
2Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Al-Qadisiya, Iraq
1Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Al-Qadisiya, Iraq
2Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Al-Qadisiya, Iraq
Corresponding Email: ali-fawzi@qu.edu.iq

Full Text:

Abstract

Background: The d-dimer test is positive even in cases of natural pregnancies. Due to the pregnancy-related hypercoagulable condition, this shows elevated activity of thrombin and enhanced fibrinolysis after formation of fibrin throughout gestation. As a result, this test is unreliable and non-specific for diagnosing venous thrombosis in pregnancy. Objective of the research: the current research was aiming at exploring the role of ultrasound examination in addition to d-dimer investigation in detecting “thrombosis of deep veins” in suspected pregnant women. Patients and methods: A cross observational sectional study was carried out by the researcher in the department of medicine in Adiwaniyah Teaching Hospital, Diwaniyah Province, Iraq between February 2022 and March 2023. Inclusion criteria were as following: pregnant women with clinical suspicion of deep venous thrombosis based on clinical features identified by 2 specialists in internal medicine and who were referred by the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics. A vacuum tube was used to collect a sample of venous blood from a peripheral vein and was send to central laboratory in the teaching hospital in order to measure d-dimer level. Results: The current study included 90 women of whom 31 (34.4 %) had positive Doppler findings consistent with deep venous thrombosis. There was statistical disparity in the level of d dimer between those with positive DVT Doppler findings and women with negative DVT Doppler findings, 3523.30 ±1773.65ng/ml versus 2553.50 ±1737.96 ng/ml, respectively (p = 0.014). Performance of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) test, showed a cutoff value of > 2200 ng/ml which is a reliable predictor of deep venous thrombosis in pregnant woman with 69 % sensitivity level and 71.8 % specificity level. Conclusion: assessment of serum level of d-dimer is an essential adjunct in the work up for assessment of pregnant women with suspicion of deep venous thrombosis despite the fact that pregnancy is a hypercoagulable state.

key word
pregnancy, d-dimer, deep venous thrombosis

References

  1. Devis, Paola, and M. Grace Knuttinen. “Deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy: incidence, pathogenesis and endovascular management.” Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy 7.Suppl 3 (2017): S309.
  2. Raia-Barjat, Tiphaine, Osasere Edebiri, and Céline Chauleur. “Venous thromboembolism risk score and pregnancy.” Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 9 (2022): 863612.
  3. Alsheef, Mohammed A., et al. “Pregnancy and venous thromboembolism: risk factors, trends, management, and mortality.” BioMed Research International 2020.1 (2020): 4071892.
  4. Al-Husban, Naser, et al. “Impact of Pregnancy-Related Venous Thromboembolism on Quality of Patients’ Lives.” Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis 27 (2021): 10760296211040873.
  5. Simcox, Louise E., et al. “Pulmonary thrombo-embolism in pregnancy: diagnosis and management.” Breathe 11.4 (2015): 282-289.
  6. Gabrieli, Dana, et al. “Thromboembolic events in pregnant and puerperal women after COVID‐19 lockdowns: A retrospective cohort study.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 155.1 (2021): 95-100.
  7. McLean, Kelley, and Mary Cushman. “Venous thromboembolism and stroke in pregnancy.” Hematology 2014, the American Society of Hematology Education Program Book 2016.1 (2016): 243-250.
  8. Urriago-Osorio, Gustavo Andrés, et al. “Pulmonary thromboembolism in pregnancy: a case report and literature review.” Open Access Emergency Medicine (2023): 217-225.
  9. Bagot, C. N., et al. “Normal pregnancy is associated with an increase in thrombin generation from the very early stages of the first trimester.” Thrombosis Research 157 (2017): 49-54.
  10. Bhave, Abhay A. “Coagulopathies in pregnancy: what an obstetrician ought to know!.” The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 69 (2019): 479-482.
  11. James, Andra H., Jerome J. Federspiel, and Homa K. Ahmadzia. “Disparities in obstetric hemorrhage outcomes.” Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis 6.1 (2022): e12656.
  12. James, Andra H., Victor F. Tapson, and Samuel Z. Goldhaber. “Thrombosis during pregnancy and the postpartum period.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193.1 (2005): 216-219.
  13. Eichinger, Sabine. “D-dimer testing in pregnancy.” Seminars in Vascular Medicine 5.04 (2005): 375-378.
  14. Al Lawati, Kumait, et al. “Ability of a single negative ultrasound to rule out deep vein thrombosis in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 18.2 (2020): 373-380.
  15. Wells, Philip S., et al. “Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis.” New England Journal of Medicine 349.13 (2003): 1227-1235.
  16. Righini, M., et al. “D‐Dimer for venous thromboembolism diagnosis: 20 years later.” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 6.7 (2008): 1059-1071.
  17. Bates, Shannon M., et al. “Diagnosis of DVT: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.” Chest 141.2 (2012): e351S-e418S.
  18. Bourjeily, Ghada, et al. “Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.” The Lancet 375.9713 (2010): 500-512.
  19. Hedengran, Katrine K., et al. “Large D‐dimer fluctuation in normal pregnancy: A longitudinal cohort study of 4,117 samples from 714 Healthy Danish Women.” Obstetrics and Gynecology International 2016.1 (2016): 3561675.
  20. Kawaguchi, Satoshi, et al. “Changes in d-dimer levels in pregnant women according to gestational week.” Pregnancy Hypertension: An International Journal of Women’s Cardiovascular Health 3.3 (2013): 172-177.
  21. Kovac, Mirjana, et al. “The use of D-dimer with new cutoff can be useful in diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy.” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 148.1 (2010): 27-30.
  22. Leung, Ann N., et al. “An official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline: evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 184.10 (2011): 1200-1208.
  23. Conti, E., et al. “Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 37 (2014): 251-270.
  24. Sivandarajah, Sivanthi. “Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 4: current evidence does not support the use of a negative D-dimer to rule out suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.” Emergency Medicine Journal: EMJ 28.3 (2011): 245-246.
  25. Eichinger, Sabine, et al. “Prospective evaluation of hemostatic system activation and thrombin potential in healthy pregnant women with and without factor V Leiden.” Thrombosis and Haemostasis 82.10 (1999): 1232-1236.
  26. Van Wersch, J. W. J., and J. M. H. Ubachs. “Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis During Pormal Pregnancy.” European Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry 29 (1991): 45-50.
  27. Sattar, Naveed, et al. “A longitudinal study of the relationships between haemostatic, lipid, and oestradiol changes during normal human pregnancy.” Thrombosis and Haemostasis 81.01 (1999): 71-75.
  28. Chabloz, Patrick, et al. “TAFI antigen and D‐dimer levels during normal pregnancy and at delivery.” British Journal of Haematology 115.1 (2001): 150-152.